blog

Friday, September 6th, 2013

Digital Wall

There is no argument that the world is getting smaller with technological advancement such as the wheel, the boat, and internet.  One has no choice but to surrender to the idea that they are a part of this invisible network, whether they like it or not.  Today, globally the main form of exports is information.

Entangling itself into the inner workings of society, we have no choice but to except the influence information and that we are all naked.  Even politicians feel the backlash, as their once private lives are now public, and open to judgment.  Many politicians, such as Clinton and Weiner, have had their careers ended because of their private life being exposed.  Should they be held accountable for their actions if they don’t affect their job?  Should we judge people based off their character instead of their performance?  The argument can go either way, but there is one thing you can be sure of, whatever you do, the system will catch you.

People spend more more time interacting with people over the internet then in person, creating this wall.  The internet as made anyone all knowing, allowing us to access information from anywhere and anyone.  Arguments are no longer a debated, theories are no longer questioned, they are now simply googled.


Friday, September 6th, 2013

Artificial vs Nature

Artificial and natural in the past have been seen as mortal enemies of each other.  Always competing with each other for existence, until  recently. Artificiality as reached a stage of complexion which has allowed it to finally learn from and copy natural design, and surpass it.

Blurring the lines, raising moral question, creating grey areas between what is right and what is wrong, what is practical and impractical, where do we draw the line?  Today, a majority of plants are genetically modified, and while people complain they are not the same, they accept it and continue to consume.  Pet architecture explores this integration of natural order and artificial design, and often results in success.  Nature provides the blueprints, and technology provides the results.

Recently there has been a resurgence of a natural lifestyle, preferring organic over processed food.  While it cost more, people believe they are making the right decision to return to the tried and true ways.  Is this a move in the right direction, or a step back out of fear of change?  At what point will we no longer be able to distinguish the artificial from the natural design?


Thursday, September 5th, 2013

Quarantine

One of the very first pages of the Geologic Now PDF has a string of phrases across the page. One reads “Design for an Infinite Quarantine”. In the context of the readings, I realized that we are the infectious disease and it is the earth that needs to be protected.

Over the time humans have been a species on earth our impact has greatly effected the geological and ecological structure of this planet. In the reading they call out that humans are both vulnerable to the geologic and agents of planetary change.  Earth is reacting to our presence–glaciers are melting, the ozone is thinning. Earth is continuing its routine–volcanoes erupt, tectonic plates crash together. We are changing the shape of the earth. We use landfill to extend area to build on and join islands.

As society and the existence of humans continues, we will adjust our culture to respond to these new geologic conditions. Perhaps, because of the raise of the ocean levels humans will become more adapted to living in water (architecturally or biologically).

lilypadcity

 

 

1. Architectural Reaction

 

 

mermaids

2. Biological reaction

 


Thursday, September 5th, 2013

People/Forest

The imagery of Miyazaki’s film was really creative and inspiring–especially the depictions of the forest species both fauna and flora in the Toxic Jungle.

 

A couple of things regarding the forest I thought was interesting–the first being its flourishing presence in a toxic environment and the second being how the human characters reacted to it. Nausicaa was compassionate and loving, even discovering that it was not the forest itself that was toxic to the humans but that it was the humans that were toxic to the forest. The antagonists in the story wanted to destroy it, and as a higher, more powerful species felt that they had every right to eradicate this passive environment, which reminded me of the Island and how Sunday felt that the only way to save the Island was to prove that it could be dangerous in protecting itself.

Going into Geologic Now…it occurred to me that as much as we would like to pretend we have compassion and understanding for these life forms that cannot communicate verbally and are subject to our actions and choices, we are much more Tolmekians than valley people. How would our environment differ if we could communicate with the forest, or if bugs were so large we could ride them instead of squash them when forced to interact.

We think of People as a being and Forest as a place; on the scale of things, humans are at the top. To actively balance the relationship between the humans, the animals, the forest, the geologic would change the dynamic dramatically and most likely in a positive way, but how can we do that.


Wednesday, September 4th, 2013

Welcome to the Planetology Thesis Studio!



All content © Copyright 2024 by Planetology.
Subscribe to RSS Feed – Posts or just Comments

Powered by WordPress
Designed by Graph Paper Press